New Abortion Expansion Laws the League fought in 2022:

 

HR 78 and SR 63 Virtue signaling Resolutions affirming Roe v. Wade

SB 1131 Protecting Identity of Abortion Workers                     AB 2626 Protects Abortionists from discipline 

SB 1142 Abortion Tourism                                                          AB 2586 Abortion grants as Reproductive Justice

SB 1245 Los Angeles County Abortion Haven                          AB 2223 Decriminalizes Infanticide
SB 1375 Lowers professional standards for abortions           AB 2134 Reproductive Health Fund Abortion grants
SB   532 “Reproductive health decisions” new civil right        AB 1940 School-based Reproductive health care
AB 1666 Ignores out-of-state abortion judgments                   AB 1918 Abortion Scholarships

AB 2091 Ignores out-of-state abortion subpoenas                  AB   657 Fast-tracks Abortion Licensing
AB 1242 Ignores out-of-state abortions warrants

AB 2320 Abortion access in rural counties (VETOED by Newsom)

WHAT DOES PROP 1 SAY?

​

“The state shall not deny or interfere with an individual’s reproductive freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and their fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives. . .”

​

WHAT DOES PROP 1'S LANGUAGE MEAN?

 

We don't know how California state courts will interpret Prop 1's very broad language that goes far beyond abortion.  Its broad grant of "reproductive freedom" - regardless of age or maturity - may be an existential threat to public health and protection of women and children.

​

PROP 1 THREATENS PUBLIC HEALTH.
PROP 1 ERODES PARENTAL RIGHTS TO PROTECT CHILDREN.

PROP 1 ENCOURAGES HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND EXPLOITATION.

​

HERE'S WHY: "Reproductive freedom" as a fundamental constitutional right may override existing laws that protect children and public health. Existing protections could be deemed "state interference."

 

• Minors may be able to consent to sex at any age and with anyone. Girls and women may sell eggs and rent their wombs to anyone - including private firms for profit - without state oversight or restrictions.

• And Prop 1 could override existing public health bans on incest and polygamy because they also interfere with sexual freedom.

• Even state regulation of abortion clinics and abortionists could be deemed unconstitutional interference with someone's right to choose a type of reproductive care.

​ 

We just do not know how expansive this "reproductive freedom" could get.

​

    VOTE NO on Prop 1.

Click on the image below to download NO ON PROP 1 PDF in English.

Haga clic en la imagen de abajo para descargar el PDF en Español.

The Right to Life League FIGHTS for Life!

Help us. Click HERE to Donate.

 

Visit our main website at 

www.RighttoLifeLeague.org

for all things pro-life.